Gasifi cation of carbon–contaning waste in a plasma–chemical reactor

Authors

  • V.E. Messerle Institute of Combustion Problems, 172, Bogenbai batyr str., Almaty, Kazakhstan; Institute of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 71 Al-Farabi Ave., Almaty, Kazakhstan; Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71, Al-Farabi ave., Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • M.N. Orynbasar Institute of Combustion Problems, 172, Bogenbai batyr str., Almaty, Kazakhstan; Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71, Al-Farabi ave., Almaty, Kazakhstan; NPTC “Zhalyn”, Pavlodarskaya str., 11, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • K.A. Umbetkaliev Institute of Combustion Problems, 172, Bogenbai batyr str., Almaty, Kazakhstan; Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71, Al-Farabi ave., Almaty, Kazakhstan; NPTC “Zhalyn”, Pavlodarskaya str., 11, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • A.B. Ustimenko Institute of Combustion Problems, 172, Bogenbai batyr str., Almaty, Kazakhstan; NPTC “Zhalyn”, Pavlodarskaya str., 11, Almaty, Kazakhstan; National Nano Laboratory of Open Type, 71 Al-Farabi Ave.,Almaty, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18321/cpc21(3)191-200

Keywords:

waste, gasifi cation, plasma-chemical reactor, synthesis gas, thermodynamic calculation, experiment.

Abstract

The results of thermodynamic calculations and experiments on plasma gasification of solid carbon containing wastes are presented using the example of medical and sanitary wastes, which showed the promise of using the plasma-chemical waste processing technology to produce combustible gas and inert mineral material. The TERRA universal computer program for calculating multicomponent heterogeneous systems was used for thermodynamic calculations. Its base of thermodynamic properties contains about 3000 substances in the temperature range of 300–6000 K. The optimum waste gasification temperature T = 1600 K is found, at which the maximum concentration of synthesis gas of 82.6 vol.% (СO – 31.7, H2 – 50.9) is reached. The experiments were carried out in a plasma-chemical reactor equipped with a 70 kW plasma torch with waste capacity of up to 30 kg/h. In the process of plasma air gasification of medical-sanitary waste at 1600 K, synthesis gas was obtained with concentration of 71.1 vol.% (H2 – 44.6, CO – 26.5) and a light gray solid inert residue. Comparison of plasma gasification and conventional waste incineration methods shows the higher energy effi ciency of plasma technology. As a result of plasma gasifi cation of waste, a combustible gas with thermal power of 430 MJ/h is obtained. When they are burned, an inert gas (CO2, H2O и N2) is formed with physical heat of 145 MJ/h. Thus, the useful thermal power of plasma gasifi cation products is three times higher than that at waste incineration. Comparison of the results of the experiment and calculations showed their satisfactory agreement. Both in calculations and in experiments, no harmful impurities were found in the products of plasma gasifi cation of waste.

References

(1). Davidson G (2011) Waste Management Practices: Literature Review. Dalhousie University: Office of Sustainability. 59 p.

(2). Heberlein J, Murphy AB (2008) Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 41(5):053001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/5/053001

(3). Messerle VE, Mosse AL, Ustimenko AB (2018) Waste Management 79:791-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.08.048

(4). Mourão R, Marquesi AR, Gorbunov AV, Filho GP, Halinouski AA, Otani C (2015) IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 43(10):3760-3767. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2015.2416129

(5). Surov AV, Popov SD, Popov VE, Subbotin DI, Serba EO, Spodobin VA, Nakonechny GV, Pavlov AV (2017) Fuel 203:1007-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.104

(6). An’shakov AS, Faleev VA, Danilenko AA, Urbakh EK, Urbakh AE (2007) Thermophysics and Aeromechanics 14(4):607-616. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864307040105

(7). Messerle VE, Mosse AL, Ustimenko AB (2016) Thеrmophysics and Aeromechanics 23(4):613-620. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864316040144

(8). Galvita V, Messerle VE, Ustimenko AB (2007) International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 32(16):3899-3906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.05.039

(9). Rusakov NV, Shcherbo AP, Mironenko OV (2018) Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology) 25(7):4-10. https://doi.org/10.33396/1728-0869-2018-7-4-10 (in Russian)

(10). Mosse АL, Savchin VV (2015) Plasma technologies and devices for waste processing [Plazmennye tehnologii i ustroystva dlya pererabotky othodov]. Belaruskaya navuka, Minsk, 411 p. (in Russian)

(11). Byun Y, Cho M, Hwang Soon-Mo, Chung J (2012) Gasification for Practical Applications, Dr. Yongseung Yun (Ed.). InTech. 183-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/48537

(12). Messerle VE, Mosse AL, Nikonchuk AN, Ustimenko AB (2015) Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics 88(6)1471-1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-015-1332-1

(13). Gorokhovski M, Karpenko EI, Lockwood FC, Messerle VE, Trusov BG, Ustimenko AB (2005) Journal of the Energy Institute 78(4):157-171. https://doi.org/10.1179/174602205X68261

(14). Messerle VE, Ustimenko AB (2007) In: Syred N. and Khalatov A. (eds.) NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6515-6_12.

(15). Golish VI, Karpenko EI, Luk’yashchenko VG, Messerle VE, Ustimenko AB, Ushanov VZh (2009) High Energy Chemistry 43(4):318-323. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018143909040134)

(16). Messerle VE, Mosse AL, Ustimenko AB (2016) IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 44(12):3017-3022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2016.2601107

(17). Zhdanok SA, Mosse AL (2008) In: Güçeri S., Fridman A., Gibson K., Haas C. (Eds) NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology. Springer, Dordrecht 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/>978-1-4020-8439-3_12

Published

2023-10-23

How to Cite

Messerle, V., Orynbasar, M., Umbetkaliev, K., & Ustimenko, A. (2023). Gasifi cation of carbon–contaning waste in a plasma–chemical reactor. Combustion and Plasma Chemistry, 21(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.18321/cpc21(3)191-200

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>