Electrochemical Discharge of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries in a K3[Fe(CN)6]/K4[Fe(CN)6] Redox Electrolyte

Authors

  • A.A. Grigoryev Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi Ave., 71, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • M.A. Ryabicheva Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi Ave., 71, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • A.E. Nurtazina D.V. Sokolsky Institute of Fuel, Catalysis and Electrochemistry, D. Kunayev Str., 142, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • F.I. Malchik Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi Ave., 71, Almaty, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18321/cpc24(3)317-332

Keywords:

spent lithium-ion batteries, electrochemical discharge, redox electrolyte, Prussian blue, response surface methodology, passivation

Abstract

Discharging of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is one of the key stages of their recycling. The main purpose of discharging spent LIBs is to prevent ignition and to ensure safety during the mechanical shredding performed at subsequent recycling stages. In the present work, the electrochemical discharge of cylindrical LIBs in a K3[Fe(CN)6]/K4[Fe(CN)6] redox electrolyte was investigated.
Using response surface methodology (central composite rotatable design), the discharge efficiency was shown to be governed by the combined effect of electrolyte concentration and temperature. The discharge efficiency (De) exhibited a non-monotonic (V-shaped) dependence on temperature: the highest efficiency was achieved at 20 °C, decreased at 50 °C, and was partially recovered at 71-80 °C. The non-linearity of the temperature effect is attributed to the competition between two processes – the increase in the ionic conductivity of the solution with rising temperature and the accelerated formation of a passivating Prussian blue (Fe4[Fe(CN)6]3) layer on the surface of the positive terminal.
Under the optimal discharge conditions (electrolyte concentration 25 wt.%, temperature 20 °C, ultrasonic power 120 W), a discharge efficiency of 18.3% was reached within 4 h. The application of ultrasound provided an additional gain of 4.2 percentage points, is likely attributed to mechanical disruption of the forming passivating layer and to enhanced mass transport. The results demonstrate the potential of combining a K3[Fe(CN)6]/K4[Fe(CN)6] redox electrolyte with ultrasonic treatment for the safe discharge of spent lithium-ion batteries and provide an explanation for the observed temperature dependence of the discharge efficiency.

References

(1) J.B. Goodenough, K.-S. Park. The Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery: A Perspective. Journal of the American Chemical Society 135 (2013) 1167-1176. Crossref

(2) Battery 2030: Resilient, sustainable, and circular. McKinsey & Company, January 2023. Available online: URL

(3) G. Harper, R. Sommerville, E. Kendrick, L. Driscoll, P. Slater, et al. Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature 575 (2019) 75-86. Crossref

(4) J. Xiao, J. Li, Z. Xu. Challenges to future development of spent lithium ion batteries recovery from environmental and technological perspectives. Environmental Science & Technology 54 (2020) 9-25. Crossref

(5) E. Mossali, N. Picone, L. Gentilini, O. Rodriguez, J.M. Pérez, et al. Lithium-ion batteries towards circular economy: A literature review of opportunities and issues of recycling treatments. Journal of Environmental Management 264 (2020) 110500. Crossref

(6) N. Garg, S. Pekkinen, E. Martinez González, R. Serna-Guerrero, P. Peljo, et al. Enhanced electrochemical discharge of Li-ion batteries for safe recycling. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 8 (2024) 2777-2788. Crossref

(7) M. Shi, Y. Ren, J. Cao, Z. Kuang, X. Zhuo, et al. Current Situation and Development Prospects of Discharge Pretreatment during Recycling of Lithium-ion Batteries: A Review. Batteries & Supercaps 7 (2024) e202300477. Crossref

(8) S. Ojanen, M. Lundström, A. Santasalo-Aarnio, R. Serna-Guerrero. Challenging the concept of electrochemical discharge using salt solutions for lithium-ion batteries recycling. Waste Management 76 (2018) 242-249. Crossref

(9) Y. Wang, H. Du, Y. Zhao, Y. Kang, J. Zhang, et al. Physical Discharge of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Induced Copper Dissolution and Deposition. ChemSusChem 18 (2025) e202401458. Crossref

(10) Y. Liu, Z. Shu, Y. Ding, T. Yan, Q. Xu, et al. A comprehensive review of pre-treatment discharge of the spent lithium-ion cells. Journal of Energy Storage 112 (2025) 115497. Crossref

(11) A.J. Bard, L.R. Faulkner. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.

(12) A. Raveendran, M. Chandran, R. Dhanusuraman. A comprehensive review on the electrochemical parameters and recent material development of electrochemical water splitting electrocatalysts. RSC Advances 13 (2023) 3843-3876. Crossref

(13) S. Bhattacharya. Central Composite Design for Response Surface Methodology and Its Application in Pharmacy. In: P. Kayaroganam (Ed.), Response Surface Methodology in Engineering Science. IntechOpen, 2021. Crossref

(14) B. Benedetti, V. Caponigro, F. Ardini. Experimental Design Step by Step: A Practical Guide for Beginners. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry 52 (2022) 1015-1028. Crossref

(15) C. Lei, I. Aldous, J.M. Hartley, D.L. Thompson, S. Scott, et al. Lithium ion battery recycling using high-intensity ultrasonication. Green Chemistry 23 (2021) 4710-4715. Crossref

(16) R.F. Gunst. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (Book Review). Technometrics 38 (1996) 284-286. Crossref

(17) A. Mondal, Y. Fu, W. Gao, C.C. Mi. Pretreatment of Lithium Ion Batteries for Safe Recycling with High-Temperature Discharging Approach. Batteries 10 (2024) 37. Crossref

(18) Cylindrical Cells. Available online: URL

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28

How to Cite

Grigoryev, A., Ryabicheva, M., Nurtazina, A., & Malchik, F. (2026). Electrochemical Discharge of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries in a K3[Fe(CN)6]/K4[Fe(CN)6] Redox Electrolyte. Combustion and Plasma Chemistry, 24(3), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.18321/cpc24(3)317-332